Grantwriting is a learned skill that differs fundamentally from writing an academic paper. While papers and grants must both be scientifically sound, novel, well-conceived, and well-written, grant proposals function to persuade the reader (funder) to fund a project based on the idea, scientific soundness, and originality. A grant proposal must sell both your research and your ability as a scientist to carry out the project.
The Professional Development and Career Office offers grant writing workshops for NIH F30, F31 and F32 awards and K awards.
October 11th , 2018
NIH Career Development Awards Grant Writing Workshop with the Grant Writer’s Seminar and Workshop group. This group has over 50 years experience helping applicants succeed and have developed a straightforward, step-by-step strategy for writing grant proposals. All attendees will receive a free workbook. Registration will be announced soon.
May 17th, 2019
NIH F award workshop with Andrew Hollenbach, PhD, Professor of Genetics as LSU School of Medicine and author of A Practical Guide to Writing a Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Grant, available through the Welch Library. Learn more and register for this event on Handshake.
Grant writing is a skill and many say it is an art. The best way to perfect the skill is to practice the art of grant writing. View each section to learn more about the grant writing process, and check out this Nature Careers: Working Scientist podcast to get an insider’s perspective on the NIH grant review process.
Ten Grant Writing Tips
- Start early.
- Read the grant announcement carefully. Make sure you are a good fit for the award and your research fits their funding priorities. Contact the program officer to share information about you and your research idea to gain their insights and suggestions.
- Obtain copies of funded and unfunded grant submissions that include the reviews. Review these grants for structure, organization and why they were or were not funded.
- Identify who will be submitting the grant on your behalf, the department’s grant administrator. Schedule a meeting with them to understand when they will need your grant AND how they can help you.
- Find three to five colleagues or mentors who will review your grant in addition to your PI. Provide dates when you will send drafts of your specific aims page or your research plan.
- Spend half of your time on the Specific Aims page. This should be the first thing you write and rewrite and rewrite. Seek input on this page early and often. This may be the only page many reviewers read.
- Use figures and tables to illustrate to make to make it easier for reviewers to grasp you research and ideas. Figures and tables can also save space.
- Make it easier for the reviewers to critique your grant. Tell them what is innovative. Limit yourself to three key messages and repeat these so they are clear. Present a focused research plan directly related to your aims.
- Show that you can succeed. Collaborate on the grant with a senior investigator who has successfully completed similar projects. If you include a co-investigator, demonstrate that the relationship is established and not just in name only.
- Use the actual review criterion to critically evaluate your own grant. Have you addressed every item the reviewer will be scoring your grant.